The most recent to stand up on the Apple and FBI contention is none other than President Obama, who prior today went to a discussion at South by Southwest Interactive. While the discussion was about “community engagement in the 21st Century,” the discussion as anyone might expect swung to the administration’s part in the prominent Apple and FBI case.

Obama made it clear that he isn’t behind Apple for the situation, saying that tech organizations shouldn’t “take an absolutist perspective” on encryption and urging them to make concessions as opposed to compelling Congress to pass new laws.

In this way, subsequent to rejecting a judge’s solicitation to open a gadget fitting in with an associate for benefit with the FBI for the situation, Apple has taken the position that it can’t be lawfully constrained to make new items that permit the entrance government needs and that it ought to be dependent upon Congress to make a law that addresses the general strategic questions within reach.

What’s more, it would seem that that is the place the case is going as Apple communicated that view at a congressional hearing before the House Judiciary Committee prior this month, in front of a government court listening to planned 22nd March.

Obama proceeded by saying that organizations shouldn’t take an “absolutist perspective” on encryption and that he supposes the arrangement will come down to making an indirect access of sorts for government.

The question that Obama had to ask is, if innovatively, it is conceivable to make an impervious gadget or framework where the encryption is strong to the point that there is no key, there’s no entryway, by any means, then how would we capture the youngster pornographer, how would we tackle, or upset a terrorist plot, what instruments will be accessible to do basic things like duty authorization.